삼성 갤럭시 S6 밴치마크

 

밴치마크는 사실 자기들이 유리한것이 있고 없고가 있어서 사용자의 실제 사용느낌을 다 반영하기는 어렵지만, 많은 사람들이 돌리는 벤치마크로 S6가 잘 나오는것 같습니다. S6보다 S6 Edge가 좀더 낮은것은 정말 특이하네요. 첫번째 그래픽 성능도 좋다고 하는 기사인데 사실 그럴것 같지는 않고요.

두번째 기사는 그래픽 성능만 보면 IPhone이 여전히 젤 좋다고 하는 기사가 있고, S6는 Iphone 5S보다 못하기도 한 결과가 있다고 하네요. 밴치마크 결과를 떠나서 아이폰이 해상도도 낮게 최적화 되어있어서 실제 빠릿빠릿함은 따라갈 안드로이드가 없다고 생각됩니다.

----------------------------

http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-s6-first-place-antutu-q1-2015-598277/

Popular benchmarking platform AnTuTu has published its Q1 2015 performance report for smartphones, listing the average scores of the top 10 handsets to pass through its test. The results are very favourable for Samsung and MediaTek, but raise more questions about Qualcomm's latest high-end Snapdragon processor.

The averaged AnTuTu results find the Galaxy S6 to be a rather nippy device, reflecting our own earlier tests. The Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge top the chart by quite a margin, followed by the new HTC One M9 and then a range of last year's flagship smartphones. Samsung appears vindicated in its choice to exclusively use its in-house 14nm FinFET Exynos 7420 in its latest flagship.

Outstripping its reputation, the MediaTek MT6595 powered Meizu MX4 manages to retain its spot in the top 5 from last year. The MT6595 is built from four Cortex-A17 and four A7 CPU cores, combined with a PowerVR Series6 GPU. MediaTek's high-end chips are clearly capable of taking on the big SoC brands these days.

However, what is perhaps most interesting about these results is the mediocre performance demonstrated by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 810, found inside the HTC One M9 and LG G Flex 2. While the One M9, on average, shows some improvement over last generation Snapdragon 805 handsets that make up the bulk of the list, the G Flex 2 sits towards the bottom of the top 10.

While we may not have expected the Snapdragon 810 to exactly match the 14nm Exynos 7420, we anticipated a clearer gap between Qualcomm's new chip and the 28nm Snapdragon 805 series.

Benchmarks being only a semi-accurate reflection of real-world performance, it is tough to say exactly what, if anything, is holding the Snapdragon 810 back. A software or task management burden is vaguely possible, but it's difficult not to suspect that the unverified overheating issue haunting the Snapdragon 810 might have more to do with it. Throttling back performance to prevent overly high temperatures is common in all chips. However, if the 810 is running even moderately hotter than the last generation, throttling could be taking place faster than usual to reduce the chip's peak performance, which would definitely show up in a benchmark test.

Furthermore, the AnTuTu GPU performance test reveals a result much more in line with what the chip specification sheets would suggest. The Exynos 7420's Mali-T760 MP8 GPU shows a slight advantage over the Snapdragon 810's Adreno 430, which in turn shows the sort of improvement that we were expecting compared with the Snapdragon 805's Adreno 420 and 801's Adreno 330. It seems that the 810 is underperforming on the CPU side, which lines up with the rumored cause of the overheating problem.

As damning as the list looks, we don't have any complaints about the performance offered by the HTC One M9. Although the same can't be said for the LG G Flex 2.

While not conclusive proof of any major issue, the results are disappointing for Qualcomm's chip and may cast further doubt over current and upcoming smartphones powered by the Snapdragon 810. Rumors such as LG's G4 potentially switching to the Snapdragon 808, aren't helping the situation either.

Even so, Qualcomm is still the most dominant SoC manufacturer in the high-performance smartphone market, for now, with 7 out of 10 devices in the list using a Snapdragon chip. It remains to be seen if Qualcomm will retain its market dominance in the high-end space throughout 2015, or if this year will present opportunities for MediaTek or Samsung to grab a bigger share.

-------------------------

http://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2015/04/01/iphone-6-galaxy-s6-speed-test/

A detailed report on AppleInsider has found graphics performance on the Galaxy S6 to fall not only far behind the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, but in some cases even behind the iPhone 5S. It's a landslide victory.

The tests use Kishonti Informatics' respected GFXBench (v3.0.2) and use OpenGL ES 2.0 and 3.0 benchmarks. The benchmark uses game-mimicking graphics to attain their results and is often seen as one of the more reliable tests for indication of real world performance.

Left to right: Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Edge and iPhone 6 (proportional comparison) – credit Gordon Kelly

Read more – iPhone 6 Vs Galaxy S6 And Galaxy S6 Edge: Samsung Gatecrashes Apple

Most notably AppleInsider claims that "In terms of fps [frames per second], the latest benchmarks show that Samsung's new 'Exynos 7' powered Galaxy S6 drops down to 15 fps—just 78 percent of the frame rate of iPhone 6 Plus—in the same test [OpenGL ES 3.0 3D]."